INTERIOR Secretary Jonvic Remulla’s description of the Bureau of Fire Protection as “very corrupt” has placed the agency under unprecedented scrutiny.
While the statement did not single out individuals, it has naturally raised questions about leadership accountability — starting with BFP Chief Jesus Fernandez and extending to regional commanders such as BFP Region 3 Director Manuel Golino.
In a hierarchical organization, institutional integrity depends heavily on the effectiveness of those entrusted with command.
BFP Region 3 has figured prominently in complaints and reports alleging irregular practices, including possible pay-for-promotion and pay-for-entry arrangements.
Although these claims remain subject to investigation, their repeated emergence over time points to potential weaknesses in oversight and internal controls.
As regional director, Golino is responsible for ensuring discipline, enforcing standards and addressing misconduct within his jurisdiction.
Failure to prevent or promptly address such issues carries implications of accountability.
The doctrine of command responsibility does not assign guilt but requires leaders to answer for conditions under their authority.
Persistent allegations, declining morale and reputational damage suggest that corrective mechanisms may not have functioned as intended.
Fernandez, as bureau chief, and Golino, as regional commander, are therefore both expected to explain what measures were taken, what gaps existed and why problems were not resolved earlier.
Remulla’s assurance that criminal and administrative remedies will be pursued signals seriousness of intent.
For these efforts to restore public trust, transparency and cooperation from senior leadership are essential.
Without clear accountability at both the national and regional levels, questions surrounding the BFP — particularly in Region 3 — will continue to cast a shadow over the institution.
